 |
 |
 |
|
A study by University of Utah biologist Dennis Bramble and
Harvard University anthropologist Daniel Lieberman made
the cover of the Nov. 18 issue of the British science journal
Nature. The study assembles evidence that humans evolved
and human anatomy looks the way it does because our ancestors
were more likely to survive if they could run.
Credit: Courtesy of Nature, cover by Justin Libby, Mathieu
Baissac and Daniel Lieberman, after photographer Eadweard
Muybridge's 19th century studies of human motion.
| |
November 17, 2004 - Humans evolved from ape-like ancestors
because they needed to run long distances - perhaps to hunt animals or scavenge
carcasses on Africa's vast savannah - and the ability to run shaped our
anatomy, making us look like we do today.
That is the conclusion of a study published in the Nov. 18 issue of the
journal Nature by University of Utah biologist Dennis Bramble and
Harvard University anthropologist Daniel Lieberman. The study is featured on
Nature's cover.
Bramble and Lieberman argue that our genus, Homo, evolved from
more ape-like human ancestors, Australopithecus, 2 million or more years
ago because natural selection favored the survival of australopithecines that
could run and, over time, favored the perpetuation of human anatomical features
that made long-distance running possible.
"We are very confident that strong selection for running - which came
at the expense of the historical ability to live in trees - was instrumental in
the origin of the modern human body form," says Bramble, a professor of
biology. "Running has substantially shaped human evolution. Running made us
human - at least in an anatomical sense. We think running is one of the most
transforming events in human history. We are arguing the emergence of humans is
tied to the evolution of running."
That conclusion is contrary to the conventional theory that running
simply was a byproduct of the human ability to walk. Bipedalism - the ability
to walk upright on two legs - evolved in the ape-like Australopithecus
at least 4.5 million years ago while they also retained the ability to travel
through the trees. Yet Homo with its "radically transformed body" did
not evolve for another 3 million or more years - Homo habilis, Homo
erectus and, finally, our species, Homo sapiens - so the ability to
walk cannot explain anatomy of the modern human body, Bramble says.
"There were 2.5 million to 3 million years of bipedal walking [by
australopithecines] without ever looking like a human, so is walking going to
be what suddenly transforms the hominid body?" he asks. "We're saying, no,
walking won't do that, but running will."
Walking cannot explain most of the changes in body form that
distinguish Homo from Australopithecus, which - when compared
with Homo - had short legs, long forearms, high permanently "shrugged"
shoulders, ankles that were not visibly apparent and more muscles connecting
the shoulders to the head and neck, Bramble says. If natural selection had not
favored running, "we would still look a lot like apes," he adds.
I Run, Therefore I Am
Bramble and Lieberman examined 26 traits of the human body - many also
seen in fossils of Homo erectus and some in Homo habilis - that
enhanced the ability to run. Only some of them were needed for walking. Traits
that aided running include leg and foot tendons and ligaments that act like
springs, foot and toe structure that allows efficient use of the feet to push
off, shoulders that rotate independently of the head and neck to allow better
balance, and skeletal and muscle features that make the human body stronger,
more stable and able to run more efficiently without overheating.
"We explain the simultaneous emergence of a whole bunch of anatomical
features, literally from head to toe," Bramble says. "We have a hypothesis that
gives a functional explanation for how these features are linked to the unique
mechanical demands of running, how they work together and why they emerged at
the same time."
Humans are poor sprinters compared with other running animals, which is
partly why many scientists have dismissed running as a factor in human
evolution. Human endurance running ability has been inadequately appreciated
because of a failure to recognize that "high speed is not always important,"
Bramble says. "What is important is combining reasonable speed with exceptional
endurance."
Another reason is that "scientists are in developed societies that are
highly dependent on technology and artificial means of transport," he adds.
"But if those scientists had been embedded in a hunter-gatherer society, they'd
have a different view of human locomotor abilities, including running."
Why Did Humans Start Running?
The researchers do not know why natural selection favored human
ancestors who could run long distances. For one possibility, they cite previous
research by University of Utah biologist David Carrier, who hypothesized that
endurance running evolved in human ancestors so they could pursue predators
long before the development of bows, arrows, nets and spear-throwers reduced
the need to run long distances.
Another possibility is that early humans and their immediate ancestors
ran to scavenge carcasses of dead animals - maybe so they could beat hyenas or
other scavengers to dinner, or maybe to "get to the leftovers soon enough,"
Bramble says.
Scavenging "is a more reliable source of food" than hunting, he adds.
"If you are out in the African savannah and see a column of vultures on the
horizon, the chance of there being a fresh carcass underneath the vultures is
about 100 percent. If you are going to hunt down something in the heat, that's
a lot more work and the payoffs are less reliable" because the animal you are
hunting often is "faster than you are."
Anatomical Features that Help Humans Run
Here are anatomical characteristics that are unique to humans and that
play a role in helping people run, according to the study:
-- Skull features that help prevent overheating during running. As
sweat evaporates from the scalp, forehead and face, the evaporation cools blood
draining from the head. Veins carrying that cooled blood pass near the carotid
arteries, thus helping cool blood flowing through the carotids to the brain.
-- A more balanced head with a flatter face, smaller teeth and short
snout, compared with australopithecines. That "shifts the center of mass back
so it's easier to balance your head when you are bobbing up and down running,"
Bramble says.
-- A ligament that runs from the back of the skull and neck down to the
thoracic vertebrae, and acts as a shock absorber and helps the arms and
shoulders counterbalance the head during running.
-- Unlike apes and australopithecines, the shoulders in early humans
were "decoupled" from the head and neck, allowing the body to rotate while the
head aims forward during running.
-- The tall human body - with a narrow trunk, waist and pelvis -
creates more skin surface for our size, permitting greater cooling during
running. It also lets the upper and lower body move independently, "which
allows you to use your upper body to counteract the twisting forces from your
swinging legs," Bramble says.
-- Shorter forearms in humans make it easier for the upper body to
counterbalance the lower body during running. They also reduce the amount of
muscle power needed to keep the arms flexed when running.
-- Human vertebrae and disks are larger in diameter relative to body
mass than are those in apes or australopithecines. "This is related to shock
absorption," says Bramble. "It allows the back to take bigger loads when human
runners hit the ground."
-- The connection between the pelvis and spine is stronger and larger
relative to body size in humans than in their ancestors, providing more
stability and shock absorption during running.
-- Human buttocks "are huge," says Bramble. "Have you ever looked at an
ape? They have no buns." He says human buttocks "are muscles critical for
stabilization in running" because they connect the femur - the large bone in
each upper leg - to the trunk. Because people lean forward at the hip during
running, the buttocks "keep you from pitching over on your nose each time a
foot hits the ground."
-- Long legs, which chimps and australopithecines lack, let humans to
take huge strides when running, Bramble says. So do ligaments and tendons -
including the long Achilles tendon - which act like springs that store and
release mechanical energy during running. The tendons and ligaments also mean
human lower legs that are less muscular and lighter, requiring less energy to
move them during running.
-- Larger surface areas in the hip, knee and ankle joints, for improved
shock absorption during running by spreading out the forces.
-- The arrangement of bones in the human foot creates a stable or stiff
arch that makes the whole foot more rigid, so the human runner can push off the
ground more efficiently and utilize ligaments on the bottom of the feet as
springs.
-- Humans also evolved with an enlarged heel bone for better shock
absorption, as well as shorter toes and a big toe that is fully drawn in toward
the other toes for better pushing off during running.
The study by Bramble and Lieberman concludes: "Today, endurance running
is primarily a form of exercise and recreation, but its roots may be as ancient
as the origin of the human genus, and its demands a major contributing factor
to the human body form."
RELATED MEDIA COVERAGE:
University of Utah and Harvard News Release Articles:
Harvard news release on EurekAlert
U of Utah news release on EurekAlert
U of Utah news release on Newswise
Associated Press Articles:
Boston
Herald
Worcester (MA) Telegram (Story no Longer Available)
Knight Ridder Articles:
Bloomberg News Service
Knight Ridder
News Service
TechNewsWorld (Story no Longer Available)
The
Bradenton (FL) Herald
The Monterey County (CA) Herald
The
Philadelphia Inquirer (Sign-up Required)
The San Luis Obispo (CA) Tribune
Reuters Articles:
Australian
Broadcast Corp. Online
Brisbane Courier Mail
Daily Telegraph, Sydney (Story no Longer Available)
Independent Online, South Africa
Macon Daily.com
Melbourne Herald Sun
MSNBC
News.com, Australia (Story no Longer Available)
Reuters UK (Story no Longer Available)
Reuters US (Story no Longer Available)
Reuters (Story no Longer Available)
Swi
ss Info
The Advertiser, Adelaide
The Australian
Yahoo.com (Story no Longer Available)
Other News Articles:
ABC News
Agence France Presse on Sci-tech Today
Agence France Presse on Yahoo.com (Story no Longer Available)
BetterHumans.com, Canada
Christian Science Monitor
National Geographic
National Public
Radio "All Things Considered" (link to audio file)
Nature online
(news story based on the study in Nature) (Sign-up Required)
New Scientist
San Jose (CA)
Mercury News (Sign-up Required)
Science
Now (online site of the journal Science)
The Age,
Melbourne, Australia (Sign-up Required)
The New York Times (Sign-up Required)
Toronto Globe and Mail (Sign-up
Required)
University of Utah Public Relations
201 S Presidents Circle, Room 308
Salt Lake City, Utah 84112-9017
(801) 581-6773 fax: 585-3350
www.utah.edu/unews
| |